On Aug 13, 2007, at 5:49 PM, Robert Scheck wrote:
> Good evening all,
> I'll get the popt maintainer at Fedora and Panu from Red Hat is
> likely to
> get co-maintainer once the package is reviewed. And for reviewing a
> there should be no open bug reports at all, so I'm walking through
> - Bugzilla Bug 102254: popt messages need explicit domain with
> -> As per http://rpm5.org/cvs/chngview?cn=8187, this bug report
> seems to be partially solved; any comments Göran?
The "partially solved" is waiting for your confirmation (or not). I
gave you the patch.
> - Bugzilla Bug 135428: popt : -help outputs unaligned
> descriptions, in
> case of <cellwidth> != <byte length>
> -> I would agree, it isn't possible to solve this bug report
> from the
> logical way Hu Zheng if this problem exists in latest popt, too.
I quote comment #12 from 2007-02-08:
If not fixed, I'll also need some help getting a reproducer
I have also asked (repeatedly) whether the problem still exists. no
I did insure that CY aligns correctly, Welsh UTF8 with wide
years ago. I can't fix what I can't see.
> - Bugzilla Bug 178413: none UTF-8 messages for GNOME applications
> The patch was merged into HEAD, but License/Copyright for the newly
> added files is missing, one of the Fedora guys claimed about this.
What is the copyright issue? Claiming "claimed about this" helps
> - Bugzilla Bug 202061: Request for more user-friendly RPM
> IMHO this bug report is resolved, as I can't see such an issue in a
> current popt version; the user-friendly thing is IMHO rpm not popt.
> Further comments or hints?
73 de Jeff
Received on Tue Aug 14 00:34:41 2007