RPM Community Forums

Mailing List Message of <popt-devel>

Re: Old Red Hat Bugzilla bug reports with popt issues

From: Jeff Johnson <n3npq@mac.com>
Date: Tue 14 Aug 2007 - 00:34:31 CEST
Message-Id: <790D06C9-0C1F-4D4A-87AD-BDFEA02D4EB8@mac.com>

On Aug 13, 2007, at 5:49 PM, Robert Scheck wrote:

> Good evening all,
> I'll get the popt maintainer at Fedora and Panu from Red Hat is  
> likely to
> get co-maintainer once the package is reviewed. And for reviewing a  
> package
> there should be no open bug reports at all, so I'm walking through  
> these:
>  - Bugzilla Bug 102254: popt messages need explicit domain with  
> dgettext()
>    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102254
>    -> As per http://rpm5.org/cvs/chngview?cn=8187, this bug report  
>    seems to be partially solved; any comments Göran?

The "partially solved" is waiting for your confirmation (or not). I  
gave you the patch.

>  - Bugzilla Bug 135428: popt : -help outputs unaligned  
> descriptions, in
>    case of <cellwidth> != <byte length>
>    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=135428
>    -> I would agree, it isn't possible to solve this bug report  
> from the
>    logical way Hu Zheng if this problem exists in latest popt, too.

I quote comment #12 from 2007-02-08:

     If not fixed, I'll also need some help getting a reproducer  

I have also asked (repeatedly) whether the problem still exists. no  

I did insure that CY aligns correctly, Welsh UTF8 with wide  
characters, many
years ago. I can't fix what I can't see.

>  - Bugzilla Bug 178413: none UTF-8 messages for GNOME applications
>    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178413
>    The patch was merged into HEAD, but License/Copyright for the newly
>    added files is missing, one of the Fedora guys claimed about this.

What is the copyright issue? Claiming "claimed about this" helps  

>  - Bugzilla Bug 202061: Request for more user-friendly RPM  
> documentation
>    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202061
>    IMHO this bug report is resolved, as I can't see such an issue in a
>    current popt version; the user-friendly thing is IMHO rpm not popt.


> Further comments or hints?

On what?

73 de Jeff
Received on Tue Aug 14 00:34:41 2007
Driven by Jeff Johnson and the RPM project team.
Hosted by OpenPKG and Ralf S. Engelschall.
Powered by FreeBSD and OpenPKG.