On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 12:10:52PM -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Running test test1 - 9.
> Test "test1 -2 foo" failed with: "arg1: 0 arg2: rest: foo" != "arg1:
> 0 arg2: foo"
I can get that failure if the line I added does not replace the prior
assignment (which makes it affect the case where *origOptString == '\0'
as well as the desired case where it is not '\0').
That's the only explanation I can come up with for why the code would
fail. I have attached a patch that codes up the increment in a slightly
different way, but I don't see how this change is any different on the
code that follows than what was there before. (Still, I might have
Received on Sun Mar 9 23:36:41 2008