On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Jeff Johnson <email@example.com> wrote:
> The added tyrrany of forcing every application that currently has
> to change to
> will be rate-determining to adoption (and glacially/tectonically slow imho)
For me, if popt 2 is not compatible with popt 1 then I would rather have to
make a conscious choice to upgrade my code (testing it for compatibility),
and having to change the libray name as a part of that is pretty minor.
Having a possibility for my program to be run-time linked with a library
that is not compatible with what it expects would be very bad, imo.
Received on Mon Jun 7 19:15:18 2010