On Monday, 15 October 2007, at 18:58:45 (-0400),
Jeff Johnson wrote:
> All depends on the relation between the build <-> install machines.
> If the build system has content that is sufficiently close to the
> install system, then the computation of the package that provides a
> dependency is just a lookup.
Indeed.
> The lookup is clean, completely dynamic, done automatically, and
> completely obscure. Will work fine for building in chroot's like
> PLD, but will have the usual problems of lack of precision using
> the open-ended versionless
> Requires: foo
Ick. This will completely break the moment a major shared library
version changes. So this really solves nothing at all...it just
shifts the problem from one spot to another spot, and in fact makes
the end result a lot worse.
> The private reason for adding (with default disabled) is to hand
> zealots a completely implemented package-only mechanism, rather
> than discussing the relative worth of soname, file, name space,
> interpreter, parentdir, linkto etc etc animules in the rpm
> dependency menagerie.
>
> I believe in lobotomies as a cure for stoopidity ;-)
"Here, have some rope. What's the big loop at the end? Oh,
nothing really...."
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <mej@kainx.org>
Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"There are two ways to slide easily through life: to believe
everything, or to doubt everything; both ways save us from
thinking." -- Polish Linguist Alfred Korzybski
Received on Tue Oct 16 05:57:08 2007