On Nov 25, 2007, at 1:54 PM, David Halik wrote:

>
> *sigh* I can't see how beecrypt is failing since I've been using  
> 4.1.2 to build since 4.4.9 without a problem. Talk about a  
> frustrating directory, I'm wondering if I should just build it  
> without perl bindings. ;)
>

Building without perl should get you a functional rpm executable.

However, its likely worth building the perl bindings if you use perl,
the bindings are quite nicely done, and better than any other
perl->rpm bindings I'm aware of.

73 de Jeff