Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
>> The team consensus decision was "both", but the path
>> choice(s) need finalization.
>
> As rpm2cpio is often needed also on the shell, I personally vote to 
> just
> install it into "bindir" and let the script stuff live in the libdir...

My vote is still to let "rpm2cpio" be a real program (rpm2cpio.c),
and provide both of rpm2cpio.sh and rpm2cpio.pl as library helpers ?

And this counts double when including support for xar rpms as well,
since the script workaround that I toyed with looked like a kludge...

--anders