On Fri, Dec 21, 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> [...]
> So should I wire -v to "rpmIsverbose()" of just add to macros.in.
Ah, good idea: yes, that would make sense: "rpm -v -bt" to let "vcheck
-v" be run. Please go for it...
> What I want to see is a common approach, whatever works for OpenPkg, works
> for rpm-5.0 too.
Currently I'm still having to get the stuff working again (see my other
mail) as the "rpm -bt" now silently no longer does anything at all ;-)
> Longer term, I shall likely re-implement vcheck in C under rpmio to
> avoid the buttload of missing perl dependencies. The functionality
> is too useful to rpm to mess around with perl Artistic anarchy imho.
> I can/will leave behind a macro for those who insist on the gud old
> stuff external to rpm (and rpmio) ...
>
> Make sense?
Yes, makes sense.
Ralf S. Engelschall
rse@engelschall.com
www.engelschall.com
Received on Fri Dec 21 23:30:39 2007