On Fri, Dec 28, 2007, Jeff Johnson wrote:

> [...]
> Hehe, names is always hardest. I'm just reluctant to trash
> already implemented functionality for Newer! Better! Bestest!
> before anyone has actually used the original implementation.

Then just name it "pgp(...)" as it not really GnuPG related...

> [...]
> Got it. I got a shot at implementing in rpm-5.0, we'll see ...
> [...]

I think it would be really great if we could provide also this
functionality! It especially brings RPM even further into the serious
"packaging integrity checking" world...

                                       Ralf S. Engelschall
                                       rse@engelschall.com
                                       www.engelschall.com