cool, semms that we will be done soon.

what do you mean with "these should be fixed in the last hour. can you confirm please?" my english is not that good, so i perhaps miss something.

but i think in general the ordering okay, since the DB_PRIVATE seems to be the most critical point from my point of view.

but, i didn't know enough about the "__errno_location / stat64 / _STAT_VER / dirfd / __fxstat64" to see, if this is a critical point.

-piet

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:08:10 -0500
> Von: Jeff Johnson <n3npq@mac.com>
> An: rpm-devel@rpm5.org
> Betreff: Re: status on porting rpm5 to qnx

> 
> On Jan 25, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Peter Kalbus wrote:
> 
> > updated list, of what is open on the qnx porting issues:
> >
> >  	- DB_PRIVATE for db 4.6.21
> 
> next on my todo ...
> 
> >  	- compile error in psm.c (missing pthread.h include?)
> >  	- __errno_location / stat64 / _STAT_VER / dirfd / __fxstat64
> >
> 
> these should be fixed in the last hour. can you confirm please?
> 
> > points which are done or at least a fix is commit to head:
> >  	
> >  	- makedev 3 parameter                             DONE
> >  	- missing d_off in struct dirent                  DONE
> >
> >  	- PTHREAD_MUTEX_DEFAULT != PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL   9434/9435
> >  	- insque/remque in search.h but not in library    9434/9435
> >
> > thanks so far to all the support and work
> >
> > guess that we can reach the line soon...
> >
> 
> yep
> 
> 73 de Jeff
> ______________________________________________________________________
> RPM Package Manager                                    http://rpm5.org
> Developer Communication List                        rpm-devel@rpm5.org