On Jan 25, 2008, at 12:15 PM, Peter Kalbus wrote:

> cool, semms that we will be done soon.
>
> what do you mean with "these should be fixed in the last hour. can  
> you confirm please?" my english is not that good, so i perhaps miss  
> something.

Apologies. My english is rather exotic jargon. Feel free to
holler when I stop communicating. I forget sometimes ...

I believe all your patches (except DB_PRIVATE) are included
on the rpm-5_0 branch and will be in rpm-5.0.1.

>
> but i think in general the ordering okay, since the DB_PRIVATE  
> seems to be the most critical point from my point of view.
>
> but, i didn't know enough about the "__errno_location / stat64 /  
> _STAT_VER / dirfd / __fxstat64" to see, if this is a critical point.
>

You will know very quickly if
     #   define __errno_location()  (&errno)
is the right thing to do on QNX.

Try
     rpm -qpW /path/to/some/non-existent/directory
to exercise the fts.c code that uses the define.

73 de Jeff