jepp, i think you're right.

i'm just checking out the stuff an compile it

feedback soon...

-piet


-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:25:47 -0500
> Von: Jeff Johnson <n3npq@mac.com>
> An: rpm-devel@rpm5.org
> Betreff: Re: status on porting rpm5 to qnx

> 
> On Jan 25, 2008, at 12:15 PM, Peter Kalbus wrote:
> 
> > cool, semms that we will be done soon.
> >
> > what do you mean with "these should be fixed in the last hour. can  
> > you confirm please?" my english is not that good, so i perhaps miss  
> > something.
> 
> Apologies. My english is rather exotic jargon. Feel free to
> holler when I stop communicating. I forget sometimes ...
> 
> I believe all your patches (except DB_PRIVATE) are included
> on the rpm-5_0 branch and will be in rpm-5.0.1.
> 
> >
> > but i think in general the ordering okay, since the DB_PRIVATE  
> > seems to be the most critical point from my point of view.
> >
> > but, i didn't know enough about the "__errno_location / stat64 /  
> > _STAT_VER / dirfd / __fxstat64" to see, if this is a critical point.
> >
> 
> You will know very quickly if
>      #   define __errno_location()  (&errno)
> is the right thing to do on QNX.
> 
> Try
>      rpm -qpW /path/to/some/non-existent/directory
> to exercise the fts.c code that uses the define.
> 
> 73 de Jeff
> ______________________________________________________________________
> RPM Package Manager                                    http://rpm5.org
> Developer Communication List                        rpm-devel@rpm5.org