Am 25.01.2008 um 18:25 schrieb Jeff Johnson:

>
> On Jan 25, 2008, at 12:15 PM, Peter Kalbus wrote:
>
>> cool, semms that we will be done soon.
>>
>> what do you mean with "these should be fixed in the last hour. can  
>> you confirm please?" my english is not that good, so i perhaps miss  
>> something.
>
> Apologies. My english is rather exotic jargon. Feel free to
> holler when I stop communicating. I forget sometimes ...
>
> I believe all your patches (except DB_PRIVATE) are included
> on the rpm-5_0 branch and will be in rpm-5.0.1.
>
>>
>> but i think in general the ordering okay, since the DB_PRIVATE  
>> seems to be the most critical point from my point of view.
>>
>> but, i didn't know enough about the "__errno_location / stat64 /  
>> _STAT_VER / dirfd / __fxstat64" to see, if this is a critical point.
>>
>
> You will know very quickly if
>    #   define __errno_location()  (&errno)
> is the right thing to do on QNX.
>
> Try
>    rpm -qpW /path/to/some/non-existent/directory
> to exercise the fts.c code that uses the define.
>

entered:	"rpm -qpW /sepp"
got:		"rpm: one type of query/verify may be performed at a time"

souds at least interesting

-piet


> 73 de Jeff
> ______________________________________________________________________
> RPM Package Manager                                    http://rpm5.org
> Developer Communication List                        rpm-devel@rpm5.org