On Mon, Jan 28, 2008, Jeff Johnson wrote:

> Careful ... the criteria is what Berkeley DB uses, not what QNX doesn't
> have.

A few months ago we already replaced all(!) occurences of u_int32_t with
uint32_t for consistency reasons and later the u_int32_t stuff was (IMHO
accidentaly) reintroduced -- at least we have no Autoconf stuff in place
for it, too. The QNX issue just caused me to recognize the inconsistency
again. But I think this consistency cleanup should be ok...

                                       Ralf S. Engelschall
                                       rse@engelschall.com
                                       www.engelschall.com