On Feb 7, 2008 12:06 PM, Jeff Johnson <n3npq@mac.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 7, 2008, at 2:57 PM, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> > The alternative would be to use a better scm, but I'm sure that's not
> > an answer you're looking for :)
> >
>
> I'll use any scm that is available. As long as the scm changes less
> often
> than once a month ...

Have you ever tried using git? I would imagine that someone in your
position who has tons of features that are in various states of
completion would fall in love with the ease and speed of git's
branching. Even for projects where I'm very marginally involved, I'll
often have 8-10 local branches with just one or two commits of varying
sanity.

If you're interested in trying out git, you can run git-cvsimport on
the CVS repo and fool around in a local git repo. Since the workhorse
of git-cvsimport is cvsps, it takes roughly as long as the initial
cache of cvsps to do.

--
Dan