On Apr 15, 2008, at 7:29 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
...
>
> D: ========== recording tsort relations
> D: ========== tsorting packages (order, #predecessors, #succesors,
> tree, Ldepth, Rbreadth)
> D: 0 0 0 1 0 0 +perl-util-5.10.0-20080414
> D: ========== successors only (938772 bytes)
> D: 1 0 0 2 0 1 -perl-5.10.0-20080413
AFAICT, this transaction installs perl-util and erases perl.
Which means that perl is _NOT_ installed at the end of the transaction.
Hence dependencies on perl are not satisifed because perl is to be
erased.
Is that the case?
73 de Jeff
Received on Tue Apr 15 13:42:01 2008