RPM Community Forums

Mailing List Message of <rpm-devel>

Re: why does RPM 5.1.0 think some fulfilled dependencies are not fulfilled?

From: Jeff Johnson <n3npq@mac.com>
Date: Tue 15 Apr 2008 - 13:40:54 CEST
Message-Id: <3F7EFCEE-AA20-4F23-9080-70C3F75F633C@mac.com>

On Apr 15, 2008, at 7:29 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:

...

>
> D: ========== recording tsort relations
> D: ========== tsorting packages (order, #predecessors, #succesors,  
> tree, Ldepth, Rbreadth)
> D:     0    0    0    1    0    0 +perl-util-5.10.0-20080414
> D: ========== successors only (938772 bytes)
> D:     1    0    0    2    0    1 -perl-5.10.0-20080413

AFAICT, this transaction installs perl-util and erases perl.

Which means that perl is _NOT_ installed at the end of the transaction.

Hence dependencies on perl are not satisifed because perl is to be  
erased.
Is that the case?

73 de Jeff
Received on Tue Apr 15 13:42:01 2008
Driven by Jeff Johnson and the RPM project team.
Hosted by OpenPKG and Ralf S. Engelschall.
Powered by FreeBSD and OpenPKG.