On Apr 15, 2008, at 12:19 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:

> På Tirsdag 15 april 2008 , 18:02:05 skrev Jeff Johnson:
>> On Apr 15, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
>>> Anyways, I tried rebuilding it with rpm 5.1.0, same happens.
>>
>> Unsorted dependencies may be just one of several flaws.
>>
>> Did you try reproducing with the patch I posted? The patch
>> should verify whether my hypothesis that the index into the  
>> dependency
>> set is the fundamental flaw.
> Yupp, it gives the same assertion error.

Does it say assertion failed or does it just segfault? The assertion
failure is different than the segfault. There is no "same".

>>
>> Also try reproducing with --noparentdirs ...
> I have parent dir deps disabled by default.

Which is not rpm-5.1.0 either.

But I want the flaw fixed, not otherwise.

73 de Jeff