RPM Community Forums

Mailing List Message of <rpm-devel>

Re: Adding "production" rpmrepo in rpm-5.1.3

From: Jeff Johnson <n3npq@mac.com>
Date: Thu 05 Jun 2008 - 22:57:48 CEST
Message-id: <E88E1F72-0345-45E9-8DBB-09E67E56AA03@mac.com>

On Jun 5, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:

> On Thursday, 29 May 2008, at 12:38:04 (-0400),
> Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
>> Any assistance in helping stabilize rpmrepo, by comparing rpmrepo
>> with createrepo generated output spew on large collections of
>> packages, is appreciated.  Please report problems here on
>> <rpm-devel@rpm5.org>.
>
> We are in the process of eliminating yum and would be quite pleased to
> eliminate createrepo as well.  So I'll pitch in happily.
>

Thanks.

I've managed to get rpmrepo under "make check" control with digest
verified content spew using popt-1.14-1.{src,i386}.rpm in a 2 package  
repository.

What I haven't tried yet is seeing whether rpmrepo data can be fed to  
yum.

I also have the apt-rpm equivalent(s) to createrepo started, and would
like to unify into rpmrepo over the next couple of week.s

Dag has a quite sensible mrepo.py script that automates repository
management of both persuasions. His problem however is dueling
tools, both apt-rpm and createrepo need to generate digests for
thousands of packages twice.

So any suugestions for integrating mrepo.py functionality
and apt-rpm metadata into rpmrepo.c are welcomed as well.
I'm not quite back to implementing yet, getting "make check" in
place on all cvs branches has been this week's funner.

Working nicely imho, several brain fart's easily identified.

73 de Jeff
Received on Thu Jun 5 22:58:27 2008
Driven by Jeff Johnson and the RPM project team.
Hosted by OpenPKG and Ralf S. Engelschall.
Powered by FreeBSD and OpenPKG.