On Jun 25, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Tim Mooney wrote:

> In regard to: Re: rpm3 package still exist, devzero2000 said (at  
> 10:06pm on...:
>
>> Why lusers want to resign package they have not created in first  
>> place: if
>> they want signed package, well, they have to ask the vendor  
>> alongside the
>> pub key - they have already paid anymore.
>
> So they can distribute it via their software distribution  
> infrastructure.
> For example, Red Hat Satellite Server.
>

Sounds like Red Hat Satellite Server, not rpm, is missing an essential
tool, if resigning "LSB format" rpms from other vendor's is the usage  
case.

73 de Jeff