On Tuesday 29 July 2008, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:

> > type of solution. Does that work for you?
>
> In general I'm ok with an approach which punishes only
> old/obsolete/deprecated/whatever platforms. But in this case I'm more
> thinking about neither distinguishing between old and new and more about
> mostly feature based testing:
>
> #ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
> #include "config.h"
> #endif
> #if defined(HAVE_STDINT_H) || (defined(__STDC_VERSION__) &&
> __STDC_VERSION__+0 >= 199901L) #include <stdint.h>
> #endif
> #if defined(HAVE_INTTYPES_H)
> #include <inttypes.h>
> #endif

This approach works fine for building rpm itself but it doesn't work when you 
are building external app that doesn't use autoconf and that app includes rpm 
public headers.

>                                        Ralf S. Engelschall
>                                        rse@engelschall.com
>                                        www.engelschall.com


-- 
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz        PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl            http://ftp.pld-linux.org/