On Aug 16, 2008, at 6:10 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> I'll dig out the reproducer, don't worry about the issue until then. I
> know that there is sufficient checking within rpm to detect the issue.
> (aside) There's a whole slew of ugly segfaults that need to be
> to handle the Newer! Better! Bestest! rpm.org product, sharing an
> with rpm-4.5.90 is not going to be pleasant. Too bad that
> rpm-4.5.90 dbenv
> handling is an inferior implementation, in this case I'd be
> perfectly happy if rpm.org
> plagarized the rpm-5.x stale lock handling without acknowledgement.
> that is unlikely to happen.
I just went back to dig out the --import reproducer using rpm-5.2-
DEVEL and failed.
So the explanation is more likely rpm.org <-> rpm5.org incompatibilities
than any change you made. Apologies for mis-guessing the cause, your
fixing is likely perfectly OK.
73 de Jeff
Received on Sat Aug 16 21:37:46 2008