On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> There are two big lies with rpm packaging methodolgy.
> (aside) The other lie is that rpm install transactions are
> atomic iff there are no packaging flaws or install host
> But this lie is "reproducible builds", which is true wrto
> rpmbuild iff the build host is set up (including
> configuration) equivalently/identically.
> I'll work up a proof-of-concept example over the next couple of months ...
The saying is:
If you are not the lead dog, the view never changes.
I am pretty sure we have been on this Iditarod before.
Infinite looping, anyone? ;)
-- Russ herrold
Received on Sun Sep 28 22:40:10 2008