On Sat, Oct 11, 2008, Jeff Johnson wrote:

> How about the simpler patch below instead?

Oh, interesting. I've to test this, but it looks like a really good
idea. And even if it wouldn't solve my problem it is still a good idea
to skip on ENOENT.

                                       Ralf S. Engelschall
                                       rse@engelschall.com
                                       www.engelschall.com