is it just me or is it an issue in rpm5.org HEAD that, using %exclude
/foo/bar in %files causes the result of installed, but unpackaged files
with mentioning /foo/bar there? Of course this causes an unsuccessfull
[22:52:55] < rsc> jbj_: is %exclude somehow broken on rpm5?
[22:54:00] < rsc> jbj_: %exclude /foo/bar -> Installed, but unpackaged files: /foo/bar
[23:00:19] < jbj_> dunno %exclude, I never use. fix likely simple, both --fuzz and %exclude
[01:33:32] < rsc> jbj_: am I allowed to put %exclude issue onto your list? ;)
[02:34:29] < jbj_> rsc: please do ;-)
[02:35:02] < jbj_> post a reproducer to rpm-devel ...
Received on Sun Oct 19 16:31:54 2008