On Jan 9, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2009, at 11:05 AM, devzero2000 wrote:
>> But a rpmbuild rewrite seems to be my current RPM goal because
>> is the only roadmap item @rpm5.org I'm hearing consensus about.
>> Off topic.
>> Am i the only who like the initial development of a dep-solver in
>> rpm5 via sat-solver ?
> No, having an "integrated depsolver" is still on the @rpm5.org
> ROADMAP, and
> these days, that also means accommodating a SAT engine as an
> assertion checker.
> I can send privately the description of the "integrated depsolver"
> is already in place in RPM for many years from when the RPM-5.0
> was formulated.
Just in case anyone else is interested, and so that I have a public
attached is/was the document describing the "integrated depsolver"
Merging rpmcache into rpmrepo to establish a client-side store of
metadata is likely the next step. Not hard, just not gotten there yet,
keep popping up, like day job priorities and necessities.
I can write up additional RPM development details about Mancoosi CUDF
format and the
SuSE zypp SAT solver aspects of depsolving anytime someone wishes.
73 de Jeff
Received on Mon Jan 12 14:35:28 2009
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s