RPM Community Forums

Mailing List Message of <rpm-devel>

Re: Should Obsoletes: become persistent?

From: Jeff Johnson <n3npq@mac.com>
Date: Thu 07 May 2009 - 00:05:23 CEST
Message-id: <73222A44-0D75-4185-92EE-A8965464446D@mac.com>

On May 6, 2009, at 5:58 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:

>>
>> Basically that leaves a back-door where a later install/upgrade
>> of the Obsolete:'d package(s) is permitted. The issue is periodically
>> re-discovered and invariably leads to
>> 	RPM sux!
>> conclusions.
>>

So how do I solve this problem? For better or worse, packages
do get renamed, and its common packaging practice to add an Obsoletes:
when doing so. It just doesn't work like expected.

(other quite cogent arguments snipped but not ignored)

73 de Jeff
Received on Thu May 7 00:05:46 2009
Driven by Jeff Johnson and the RPM project team.
Hosted by OpenPKG and Ralf S. Engelschall.
Powered by FreeBSD and OpenPKG.