On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Jeff Johnson <n3npq@mac.com> wrote:
>
> On May 7, 2009, at 12:08 PM, devzero2000 wrote:
>
>>
>> Hmm, probably i have missed something :
>>
>
> Hehe, you're not alone. The "Java" in "JavaScript"
> has nothing whatsoever to do with Sun(trademark) Java(trademark).

Yes, I already know well :=). It was only for tell an example
packaging on /usr/lib/<pkg> that use different subdir for arch. For
pure chance was gcj

>
>>
>> But probably none should have both 32/64 version  of libjsm.so.
>
> The usage case for libjsm.so applies iff two multilib versions
> of rpm are installed simultaneously. So far, there hasn't
> really been a need for two rpm multilib executables simultaneously
> installed (there is a need for multilib rpm libraries to be installed
> side by side, but libjsm.so is a module, not a library, so the
> issue of path choice conventions gets murkier).
>

OK. Got the point.


Regards