On Jan 25, 2008, at 4:24 AM, R P Herrold wrote:

> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
>>> ... you do remember that there's something seriously
>>> broken with variable-length fields?  I just have had
>>> zero cycles to put this right.
>
>> -ENOCONTEXT. What is a "variable length field"?
>
> possibly this one?
>     http://bugs.linuxbase.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1875
>

Bug #11875 is addressed by adding --lsb. I will verify as soon as I  
get lsbpkgchk
fixed up this weekend.

I still don't know what "variable length fields" are.

73 de Jeff