RPM Community Forums

Mailing List Message of <rpm-lsb>

Re: LSB Package API

From: Jeff Johnson <n3npq@mac.com>
Date: Sat 21 Jun 2008 - 16:32:10 CEST
Message-id: <E08CBCB6-E9AF-41A8-8167-6211C628A2D3@mac.com>

On Jun 21, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:

>
> On Jun 21, 2008, at 5:15 AM, Denis Washington wrote:

> As promised, here's certain issues I see in the current  
> implementation.
>


IMHO, your markup needs to be thought through more carefully, if the
"Exmples and attributes" section at

     http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/LSB_Package_API

is any indication.

Sure markup is easy, and you can always consider your markup
to be domain specific to the LSB "Berlin API".

Meanwhile, there are any number of types of pre-existing
markup that could/should be borrowed instead

Re-inventing a Newer! Better! Bestest! markup that requires Yet  
Another Set Of
Parsers to be written in python/perl/ruby/whatever will
determine the rate of adoption of the application, not otherwise, imho.

FWIW your "Berlin API" markup is no better or worse than most, just  
different.

hth

73 de Jeff
Received on Sat Jun 21 16:34:19 2008
Driven by Jeff Johnson and the RPM project team.
Hosted by OpenPKG and Ralf S. Engelschall.
Powered by FreeBSD and OpenPKG.