On Jul 12, 2007, at 6:41 PM, Eric MSP Veith wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On Thursday 12 July 2007, Jeff Johnson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Jul 12, 2007, at 3:30 PM, Eric MSP Veith wrote:
>>> I'll try fetching the elflibs and rebuilding rpm against them and
>>> report back.
>> Yep, you need elfutils to see ELF dependencies with rpmdeps.
> Yeah, finally rpmdeps works. I found that I *had* a libelf library
> but it was libelf-0.8.9, not the version from RedHat's elfutils
> package. RPM
> didn't link against my version, so I replaced it, and now it works.
> for all the help! :-)
Good. FWIW, libelf is almost good enuf for rpm elf linkage, but
elfutils libelf is
a way slicker implementation than any other gelf API.
>> Yes, robust mutexes are not in 2.6.17 kernels, but I would have
>> thought that
>> glibc-2.6 would have not returned EOWNERDEAD if robust mutexes were
>> not supported.
> I'm using glibc-2.4 here. It's time for another upgrade of some
> base packages
> anyways (kernel-headers, glibc), and two and a half month of spare
> time just
> began, so there's plenty of time to do this. :-)
You almost certainly need a glibc from abt a year ago, robust mutexes
around Valentine's Day 2006.
73 de Jeff
Received on Fri Jul 13 00:50:59 2007