On Mar 4, 2009, at 9:29 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> I've seen this issue handled in the past by breaking up the RPM
> packages into binary arch/os components and non arch/os common
Exactly, that's the traditional approach. It just gets a bit more
complicated with the tree I'm trying to use RPM to manage. Not
impossible, just more complicated.
I greatly appreciate the input from this list. It's given me issues
and solutions to consider that I had not yet looked at.
Horse ... Water ... Drink.
Received on Wed Mar 4 18:36:51 2009