RPM Community Forums

Mailing List Message of <rpm-users>

Re: Evaluating macros defined in specfiles

From: Eric MSP Veith <eveith@wwweb-library.net>
Date: Sun 03 May 2009 - 18:42:25 CEST
Message-Id: <200905031842.25368.eveith@wwweb-library.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 03 May 2009, Jeff Johnson <n3npq@mac.com> wrote:
> (assuming __m2rpath could handle argv[1]like stdin) and other
> bizarreness.

Yep, this script does. Ok, so again I'm eager for the next RPM milestone 
release, just like I was for 5.1 :-D

> No bleeping clue whether embedding perl is useful (or not), but
> the embedding deed is done.

I guess it won't be used often, but in this case it's extremely useful. Can 
you tell me the revision number in the 5.2/trunk branch that introduced it, 
perhaps I'll just patch it into 5.1.9 by myself.

Yes, I promise I won't whine if I break my own RPM installation by doing 
this. :-)

> As sent privately, the limit is likely some multiple of 8192b, not 8192.
> I've just forgot what the limit actually is.

Got that mail, thanks for the hint. 

		-- Eric



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkn9yXEACgkQfkUtd7QNU/vRFACfYj+hWV6gn2CejdyRerijlg9d
AGMAmgNk2eu3HGAGYKF+ErSqXKxuIz5R
=DHKD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Sun May 3 18:42:47 2009
Driven by Jeff Johnson and the RPM project team.
Hosted by OpenPKG and Ralf S. Engelschall.
Powered by FreeBSD and OpenPKG.