On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> OK. Please note that distributing patches, while a perfectly common
> and useful methodolgy, is fundamentally at odds with RPM's original
> design goals:
> Virgin sources, with patches applied, built reproducibly.
From the crypt (rpm-list from years past):
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> FWIW, there are 2 big lies in rpm:
> 1) reproducible builds.
> #1 is true iff one knows how to set up a build environment.
-- Russ herrold
Received on Sun Nov 8 03:54:56 2009