RPM Community Forums

Mailing List Message of <rpm-users>

Re: Glibc %post

From: Eric MSP Veith <eveith@wwweb-library.net>
Date: Mon 10 May 2010 - 00:14:30 CEST
Message-Id: <201005100014.33367.eveith@wwweb-library.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 10 May 2010, Jeff Johnson <n3npq@mac.com> wrote:
> I'll wager the same task that /usr/sbin/glibc_post_upgrade.i686 does can
>  be done like 10x fewer lines of lua than in C and voo-doo ASM. ANy
>  takers?
> 
> Disclaimer:
> 	I already know my answer: The house collects on "00" and "0" no matter
>  what ;-)

I guess the house just lost the bet. I am *forced* to produce a good glibc 
(actually, eglibc) RPM that does upgrading from, say, glibc-2.7 to 
eglibc-2.11.

There was a limit on the bytes of embedded lua/perl/whatever AFAIR, is this 
still true?

				Eric
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkvnM8gACgkQhS0drJ3goJLK7QCeM7UpKFHt0fK5FL1GZsF9H68n
HzMAnRKuOPtxq8/FSqMBC2934dEiUnD0
=xi6c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Mon May 10 00:14:57 2010
Driven by Jeff Johnson and the RPM project team.
Hosted by OpenPKG and Ralf S. Engelschall.
Powered by FreeBSD and OpenPKG.