RPM Community Forums

Mailing List Message of <rpm-users>

Re: Regarding reliability of

From: <manjunathan.padua@wipro.com>
Date: Tue 24 Aug 2010 - 11:20:34 CEST
Message-ID: <336834A7A2D8B34BA5A8906E6E71DF8701D82472@BLR-SJP-MBX01.wipro.com>
Dear  Jeff

Any update on the TPPM  support availability in the latest release of RPM5 ?

 

Thanks & best regards

Manjunathan Padua

 

From: Jeff Johnson <n3npq@mac.com <mailto:n3npq@mac.com?Subject=Re:%20Regarding%20reliability%20of%20&quot;repackage&quot;%20and%20&quot;rollback&quot;%20options%20in%20RPM%205.x%20series> > 
Date: Tue 10 Nov 2009 - 21:02:07 CET
Message-id: <F2A43FAB-78D7-4F87-993C-7976234E2DBC@mac.com> 
The comments below most definitely do not apply to @rpm5.org code,
only to code produced by @rpm.org.
 
Repackaging is on by default always, and the --rollback framework
is still very much in place in @rpm5.org code.
 
As for "unreliable", that is an opinion from developers who do not
(and have not) used --rollback as in @rpm5.org.
 
However, please note that something called
        Transactionally Protected Package Management
(TPPM for short) is actively under development and will significantly  
change
how --rollback is implemented @rpm5.org over the next
couple of months.
 
So if you are looking to use --rollback then you may wish to consider
waiting for the description of TPPM.
 
73 de Jeff
 
On Nov 10, 2009, at 1:16 PM, manjunathan.padua@wipro.com wrote:
 
> Dear RPM5 team
>  We are considering use of RPM 5.x series as the packaging tool for  
> our system.
> During evaluation of rpm we found the following information on   
> features such as "repackage" and "rollback" are not reliable and  
> should not used for generally/production use ?
> Is this still the case in RPM 5.x series ?
> 
> -----------The release notes for RPM 4.6.0 contain  
> this:----------------------------------
>  Removed features 
> 
> Support for repackage and rollback have been removed as they're seen  
> too unreliable to be generally useful.
> Internal network transports have been removed. The remote fetch  
> capability is preserved by using an external, configurable helper  
> (curl by default). For network related configuration such as proxy  
> settings, environment variables like http_proxy are honored by curl,  
> rever to helper documentation for futher information.
> Solve database support has been removed as it has proven  
> impractical, severely limited in functionality and hasn't been used  
> by any major distro in years. Plans are to replace the suggestion  
> mechanism by a more flexible plugin architecture at some point.
> Support for automatic package relocation for IA-32 emulation layer  
> on IA-64 has been removed.
>   
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Appreciate your expert advice on this.
> 
> Thanks & best regards,
> 
> Manjunathan Padua Y

 


Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. 

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. 

WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. 

www.wipro.com
Received on Tue Aug 24 11:36:52 2010
Driven by Jeff Johnson and the RPM project team.
Hosted by OpenPKG and Ralf S. Engelschall.
Powered by FreeBSD and OpenPKG.