RPM Community Forums

Mailing List Message of <rpm-users>

Re: What's the createrepo equivalent in rpm5 ?

From: Anders F Björklund <afb@rpm5.org>
Date: Fri 25 Feb 2011 - 13:59:20 CET
Message-Id: <54C0D970-00EB-40DB-A923-C5E785D0FDB1@rpm5.org>
Tobias Gerschner wrote:

>> Wouldn't be hard to fix, is on my todo++ list, but there's been zero
>> interest in using rpmrepo so far, hence its a low priority.
>> You know where http://launchpad.net/rpm blueprints are.

> OTOH switching to a format which is mainly driven by a community that does not seem keen to collaborate is not very pleasing either.
> Has anyone any links/ information about the reasons as to why repo-md has the format that it has today?

Think it went from the first extracted rpm headers (.hdr)
to XML metadata (xml.gz) to SQL metadata (.sqlite.bz2)...

Your best guess is http://createrepo.baseurl.org/ and

> Is there any interest to review this format and potentially come up with a new blueprint? While I am personally very interested in sorting this I can only see this work with input and support from multiple drivers which would then collaborate on this new format and actually use it. I don't just want to do it my way, but have an accepted, comfortable solution that is well engineered and has a good future with rpm5.

I'm pretty certain that whatever createrepo/repodata does
for a new format, it will Require yum and Conflict rpm5 ?


> Any thoughts? Is there an option/ solution I am missing?

There is the mixture of rpm headers and xml metadata
that urpmi is using, or using a rpmdb directly perhaps ?

But changing the "pkgid" (to not include the payload)
and adding partial downloads sounds like improvements...

Received on Fri Feb 25 14:01:57 2011
Driven by Jeff Johnson and the RPM project team.
Hosted by OpenPKG and Ralf S. Engelschall.
Powered by FreeBSD and OpenPKG.