Performance was my whole rationale for trying sqlite3.
I do have some power backup, so I will try reducing the fsyncs.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Mark Hatle <email@example.com>
> Note, sqlite support was -much- slower then BerkeleyDB. It was only added
> deal with people who didn't want to have the Sleepcat license conditions.
> Performance was definitely not the reason.
> If your device can live w/o the syncs, you can disable them -- mostly in
> the RPM
> configuration... just keep in mind if someone powers down in the middle of
> transaction the data base is more likely to be messed up then with the
> > Jate
> RPM Package Manager http://rpm5.org
> User Communication List firstname.lastname@example.org
Received on Tue Jan 12 22:44:24 2016