On Jul 23, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:

> 2012/7/23 Jeffrey Johnson <n3npq@mac.com>:
>> 1 … 2 … 3 …
>> 
>> I will be using this list shortly to collect patches/comments/rationales
>> while looking at the current state of the "LSB Package Format" tools
>> available here
>> bzr checkout http://bzr.linuxfoundation.org/lsb/devel/misc-test
>> 
>> The <rpm-lsb@rpm5.org> mail archive will be used over the next weeks/months
>> to preserve my comments and patches "transparently" for my usage purposes.
>> 
>> Unsubscribe now if you do not wish to be bothered by patch streams,
>> and comments from me related to my investigations that are likely
>> irrelevant and of no interest to anyone who uses RPM in LSB,  any existing
>> Linux vendor distro, or to any current computer user on the planet earth.
>> 
>> Caveat emptor.
> AWESOME!
> 

This is AWESOME! … why?

Your unilateral/undiscussed decision to "support"  "LSB Format" (nee RPMv3)
to please Mandriva (which is now using Mageia: good riddance!) led to
a zero-tolerance
	If you want "LSB Format", then I am forced to write the exploit for RPMv3 format.
opinion from me which has now led to a ROSA contract that specifically excludes
any work on LSB packaging.

I.e.
	no pay == "free beer"

So
	Bugger off!

> Lemme know about any ways whatsoever that I can assist yer efforts in
> any way (NB: scalability considerations).
> 

You have already "helped" enough, thank you.

(again, aside to others)
Unsubscribe if you don't wish to read patch streams and
obscure -ENOCONTEXT comments. I wish a persistent
store for comments that I will be making: <rpm-lsb@rpm5.org>
is an idle niche that bothers nobody with an archive attached.

73 de Jeff