2012/7/24 Jeffrey Johnson <n3npq@me.com>:
>
> On Jul 23, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
>
>> 2012/7/23 Jeffrey Johnson <n3npq@mac.com>:
>>> 1 … 2 … 3 …
>>>
>>> I will be using this list shortly to collect patches/comments/rationales
>>> while looking at the current state of the "LSB Package Format" tools
>>> available here
>>> bzr checkout http://bzr.linuxfoundation.org/lsb/devel/misc-test
>>>
>>> The <rpm-lsb@rpm5.org> mail archive will be used over the next weeks/months
>>> to preserve my comments and patches "transparently" for my usage purposes.
>>>
>>> Unsubscribe now if you do not wish to be bothered by patch streams,
>>> and comments from me related to my investigations that are likely
>>> irrelevant and of no interest to anyone who uses RPM in LSB,  any existing
>>> Linux vendor distro, or to any current computer user on the planet earth.
>>>
>>> Caveat emptor.
>> AWESOME!
>>
>
> This is AWESOME! … why?
>
> Your unilateral/undiscussed decision to "support"  "LSB Format" (nee RPMv3)
> to please Mandriva (which is now using Mageia: good riddance!) led to
> a zero-tolerance
>         If you want "LSB Format", then I am forced to write the exploit for RPMv3 format.
> opinion from me which has now led to a ROSA contract that specifically excludes
> any work on LSB packaging.
>
> I.e.
>         no pay == "free beer"
>
> So
>         Bugger off!
>
>> Lemme know about any ways whatsoever that I can assist yer efforts in
>> any way (NB: scalability considerations).
>>
>
> You have already "helped" enough, thank you.
>
> (again, aside to others)
> Unsubscribe if you don't wish to read patch streams and
> obscure -ENOCONTEXT comments. I wish a persistent
> store for comments that I will be making: <rpm-lsb@rpm5.org>
> is an idle niche that bothers nobody with an archive attached.
grow up..

I'll get back to you later..

--
Regards,
Per Øyvind